Regulations

According to article 2, companies that carry out the installation of new generation telecommunications infrastructure and control, management and security telecommunications networks in buildings or groups of buildings will be considered Type F telecommunications installation companies.

On April 29, 2011, the Council of Ministers approved the Plan to Promote the Adoption of the New Internet Protocol, IPv6, in Spain. The plan, spearheaded by the Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Trade, and, within the framework of the general integration of IPv6 into public administrations, by the Ministry of Territorial Policy and Public Administration, addresses the impending exhaustion of addresses for the previous version of the protocol (IPv4).

Introduction: Development of the Category 6 standard:
The current ISO/IEC Category 6 and its corresponding Class E originated at the historic Munich meeting in September 1997, where the targets for positive ACR were defined at 200 MHz for Category 6 and 600 MHz for Category 7. Since then, Category 7 has often had its justification questioned and has seen little development, while in Orlando (January 1998) additional parameters were added for Category 6 and Enhanced Category 5, and in Tokyo (May 1998) the complete parameter table up to 250 MHz for Category 6 was defined.

The Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Trade has presented to the sector the draft Royal Decree on actions regarding the radio spectrum for the development of the Digital Society, which includes a series of actions that seek to make available to operators all the spectrum available in frequency bands of great economic and social interest,

Types of infrastructures and facilities that comprise the Register of telecommunications installation companies and technical means required of telecommunications installation companies.

With the steady increase in energy consumption over the past ten years, one of the main problems facing data center owners today is how to reduce that consumption.

The telecommunications sector and companies affected by the 2G and 3G network shutdown assume that a process that has been underway for several years, albeit at a slower pace than many experts would like, must be completed before 2030. The underlying problem is the lack of an official, unified date for the complete phasing out of both networks. Since operators in each country control the timeline, the shutdown is not uniform globally, and companies lack a fixed, unified schedule for the migration plan.